June 24, 2013 05:38
flooded_New_Orleans_20050901_trim

The U.S. Supreme Court gave no reason for refusing to review the September 2012 decision by the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals that threw out a lower court judgment finding the Army Corps of Engineers partly to blame for catastrophic flooding in some neighborhoods after Hurricane Katrina.

The Times-Picayune reports that the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to review the September 2012 decision by the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals throwing out a multi-billion-dollar judgment against the Army Corps of Engineers that found the agency partly to blame for catastrophic flooding in some New Orleans area neighborhoods after Hurricane Katrina.

The appeals court had found that the Army Corps of Engineers is not liable for billions of dollars in flood damage in the Lower 9th Ward and St. Bernard Parish  that a lower court said resulted from the agency's failure to maintain the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet. The court said the corps was immune from damages in a lawsuit due to a provision protecting an agency that makes a discrection decision.

The U.S. Supreme Court gave no reason for refusing to hear the case.

Read the T-P story here.

Should Democrats dump Dixie? DEC 17 Blogger Bob Mann gives his two cents on the question being discussed among tight-pants-bushy-beard-hat-on-in-the-house northern liberals who were disgusted by Mary's defeat. In a round-about way, he's seeking to remind them that the pendulum always swings back. Must-read story about Janzen Jackson DEC 17 This post on Vice Sports is an in-depth look at the life of Janzen Jack

Read the flipping paper